Using Web 2.0 to keep eWeek honest

Everybody pile on!   One of the great things about Web 2.0 is that guys like Pedro Pereiro at eWeek think that they can be judge, jury and jailer - without having to investigate and know anything about what they are writing. Sorry Pedro, but as a guy who doesn't even allow comments on your posts, I don't think you are in any position to make judgments or throw stones on this one. Shoot, you don't even link to Xenochron's post so that people can read it for themselves. So get with it Pedro, that was a load.

Pedro assumes I was just being a corporate chimp, spewing the corporate line - but that's where he's got it wrong. The rep who covers Xenochron's territory thought I should have refuted Xenochron's claims more harshly, but as Xenochron and I have discussed since then, I have no way of knowing what every sales rep at Dell is doing at any given time.  I don't think Pedro knows that I have frequent conversations with channel partners, customers and co-workers (including one named Michael) every now and then about our channel efforts and I can say that a move by an individual rep to circumvent the channel on an opportunity with Xenochron's company would best be described as a CLM

Blog conversations can be like email, where wrong assumptions are made and the editing is minimal. Some things that start in public don't end there.  I didn't know who Xenochron was when this surfaced, but as it turns out we have communicated before in the past - privately and publicly.  I blogged about our most recent private discussions here.  I'm OK with what Xenochron said, it was a passionate blog entry from a person who works in the trenches of technology. We have a lot in common.

But I'm not done with eWeek and Pedro's Web 2.0 posing. Not only did Pedro do a hatchet job on me, but a comment of mine on a recent eWeek blog post was censored and not posted.  It was a short comment, something like: "And John who commented above works for Lefthand?"  (The rollover on John's name was a giveaway.)  For people that don't know, Lefthand is a competitor of Dell EqualLogic and occasionally their people show up in the blogosphere making little chippy comments like this without identifying who they are.  I think people can usually see through that stuff, but I thought I'd call them on it this time.  What bugged me is that I wasn't given the space for the briefest of equalizers. What's with that, eWeek?

So, Pedro and eWeek, you have a little 'splainin to do about the differences between practicing and preaching where Web 2.0 is concerned.

Comments  Comment RSS Feed

Christopher Beer said:

 In your post you say "Sorry Pedro, but as a guy who doesn't even allow comments on your posts..."

 I am confused - why do you say this? I went to the eWeek Channel Insider page you linked to and right at the bottom of Pedro's story there is a link for posting a comment. Did you try to post a reply that got rejected?
 

Marc Farley, Inside IT Lead Blogger said:

Christopher,  I didn't post a reply last night.  I guess my late night ADD symptoms kept me from realizing that the comment area wasn't an ad.  On second look, the main page comment link doesn't look like the normal links that you normally find under a blog post.  Everything else I said still applies, such as the lack of links (except a link to Netapp's site off the word "EqualLogic). Weak and not very Web 2.0-like.

CuttyHunkT said:

So you missed the big ol' comment box at the bottom of the posting, but everything ELSE you said is 100-percent accurate. Yeah. Right. Ummm Hmm.

You guys got pwn3d on this one, my friend. Suck it up and take it like a man. And btw, why pick on this posting when it pretty much just repeats an earlier post by Jessica Davis? "Dell Direct Sales Rep End Runs Equallogic VAR"  Are you sweet on her?
 

CuttyHunkT said:

 Upon closer inspection you also got the fact that the kid didn't link to the XenoChron blog wrong. The link is right in the text on the words "write about it."

 That's pretty much the two main points of your argument. Marc. You might actually be unqualified to use the InterWebs. Why don't you step away from the blog and let the adults talk.
 

Marc Farley, Inside IT Lead Blogger said:

CuttyHunk,

You are as sloppy as I am.  I mentioned Jessica Davis' post and the fact that my comment on it was not posted.  The thing that got me going about Pedro were his personal shots. I take a few and don't mind them when they are justified.  This wasn't. 

Pedro said:
Marc, you're 0 for 3. Not only is there an area for comments at the bottom, but there is also a link to XenoChron's blog. Oh, and you got my name wrong.
Marc Farley, Inside IT Lead Blogger said:

Pedro,

I don't count the typo on your last name as a miss - that's a foul ball.  The part about not posting my comment on Jessica Davis' post from last week is a hit. My assertion that you didn't check out the story before writing?  That's  a hit too. 

CuttyHunkT said:

Marc, seriously, man. I feel your pain. I know you're being paid to defend a fairly defenseless act. But get it right, at least.

You said: There's no place to comment on the guy's story. WRONG. It's right there at the bottom

You said: The guy didn't link to the original blog post: WRONG. The link is right there in his post.

You said: The eWEEK folks censored your comments on a previous blog post. WRONG: Your cheeky comment is right there among the comments on Jessica Davis' post (and it's dated June 2)

You concede all those points, right? You've since gone and looked and found all these things to be true, haven't you?

And now we see you got the poor guy's name wrong, apparently. Remind us all: What part of this did you have right again? As best I can tell, you were right on when you wrote, "Blog conversations can be like email, where wrong assumptions are made and the editing is minimal." At that point you probably should have hit "cancel" and stepped away from your computer.


 

 

Marc Farley, Inside IT Lead Blogger said:

LOL, CuttyhunkT - you are right - I should have hit cancel.  I already copped to the slop of missing the comment link.  So I checked the cached version of the page and low and behold there was the link to XenoChron's post. Yes, that was dopey too. 

There were more comments than mine waiting to get approved on Jessica Davis' post.  Those went up today after all this started.  I would have made sure these all got posted too if I was at eWeek, because they weren't and if you had run down the link in my post the first time you'd know it.  So you aren't so perfect either.  Then there is the fact checking that didn't happen in Pedro's post.  There is plenty of slop in this comedy.  

If I had hit cancel way back when, I wouldn't have had the pleasure of this conversation with you. By now, the only people tracking this have a vested interest in where it goes. What's yours, CuttyhunkT?

Leave a Comment

Compose
Preview
(required ) 
(required , not published) 
(optional )
(required ) 

Note: Conversation is encouraged and expected. However, moderation of comments is necessary to prevent spam, personal attacks, profanity, mentions of legal action or off-topic commentary. We will not publish comments that advertise third-party shopping sites or ones that violate our terms of service.

Comments related to specific product support or customer service issues will be addressed separately rather than posted here. Please use the links in Contact Us for product and customer service assistance.